Writ petition concerning issuance of a passport; Union of India's counsel stated the passport had been issued to the petitioner, and with both sides conceding, the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
����������������� CWP No. 2393 of 2024 Date of Decision:02.04.2024
Ranjit Kumar
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Ajay Singh, Advocate Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Banga, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Monica Chawla, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
India, at the outset, submits that passport has been issued to the petitioner.
disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
02.04.2024 paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.02 04:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ranjit Kumar
Union of India
others
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
