Disposed

Dr. Shri Niwas Sharma v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Jan 2024CWP/54/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition sought mandamus for release of sanctioned Leave Travel Concession. Counsel stated the grievance was pending before respondents; court disposed of petition directing Director Higher Education, Haryana, to decide pending legal notice dated 01.02.2023 by a speaking order within three months, with costs of ₹25,000 for non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide legal notice dated 01.02.2023 by speaking order within three months; ₹25,000 costs if not passed.

Dr. Shri Niwas Sharma Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

2024:PHHC:000981

CWP-54-2024

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

132 CWP-54-2024 Date of Decision: 08.01.2024

¶6

Dr. Shri Niwas Sharma

¶7

…Petitioner(s)

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶11

Present:Dr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner

¶12

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

¶13

¶14

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

¶15

This petition has been filed, inter alia , seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release/disburse the amount of Leave Travel Concession in favour of the petitioner sanctioned vide order dated 18.12.2018, Annexure P-2.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending legal notice, dated 01.02.2023, Annexure P-8, in a specified period.

¶17

Notice of motion.

¶18

PAYAL 2024.01.09 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:000981

CWP-54-2024

-2-

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending legal notice shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously.

¶23

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director Higher Education, Haryana, to consider and decide the pending legal notice dated 01.02.2023, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a

¶24

period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶25

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹25,000 to the petitioner.

¶26

		(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
08.01.2024
Payal
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
	Whether reportable	Yes/No

¶27

PAYAL 2024.01.09 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Dr. Shri Niwas Sharma v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Shri Niwas Sharma v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harnandi Vs State of Haryana and Others

Mahesh Kumar and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Arti Vs State of Haryana and Others

Om Prakash Vs State of Haryana and Others

Dr. Santosh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sunil Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others