Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy in accordance with law; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:000746
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.: 115
Civil Writ Petition No.18519 of 2023 Date of Decision: January 08, 2024
Sunil Kumar
..... PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & others
..... RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
PRESENT : - Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. Ram Darshan Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for.
(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge January 08, 2024 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned: Yes/ No Whether Reportable: Yes/ No
AVIN KUMAR 2024.01.08 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order.
Sunil Kumar
State of Haryana & others
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
