Petitioner filed CWP seeking direction to re-issue passport. Convicted under IPC Sections 279 and 304-A for a crime committed in 2010. Counsel for respondent undertook to adjudicate within eight weeks. Court disposed the petition based on this commitment without recording a detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
����������������� CWP No.5341 of 2024 Date of Decision:05.04.2024
Resham Singh
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Vishal Mehta, Advocate for Mr. Sarabjit Singh Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms.Shweta Nahata, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.05 03:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No.5341 of 2024 -2- �����������������
period of five years from the date of conviction has passed away and quantum of sentence awarded was less than two years.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
05.04.2024 paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.04.05 03:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue direction to respondents to re-issue passport to petitioner convicted under IPC Section 304-A and 279.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Resham Singh
Union of India
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
