Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, vacated all interim orders and disposed of pending applications.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders vacated; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
105
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5255-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.07.2024
ANIL KU M AR LAMBA
. . . . Petitio n er Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
. . . . Respondents ****
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
Present Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Adv o cate and Ms. Mamta Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
petiti o n.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE
July 24, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Wh e ther speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Wh e ther reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.07.25 11:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil Kumar Lamba
Union of India
Another
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
