Writ petition dismissed as the cause of action no longer survived; question of law left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
218
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3266-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.07.2024
M/S SAMS U NG INDIA ELECTRONICS P VT. LTD. Vs.
. . . . Petitio n er
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
. . . . Respondents
****
**CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH ******
Present Mr. Surjeet Bhadu, Advocate Mr. Veer Singh, Advocate Mr. Agam Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 23, 2024 Mohit goyal 1. Whe t her speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whe t her reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.07.24 09:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India and Others
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Sanjay Vashisth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
