Writ petition disposed of by referring to a detailed order of even date passed in a companion matter; the judgment itself contains no independent reasoning or findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
�����������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
111-6
CWP-4228- 2023
Date of Decision : 18.04.2024
NARINDER SINGH AND OTHERS … PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.B.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
For orders, see detailed order of even date passed in CWP-16421-
2022 titled as “ Amarjeet Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
18.04.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.04.19 14:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Narinder Singh and others
State of Punjab and others
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
