Petitioner sought regular appointment or continuation as Sub-Staff after Bank of Baroda discontinued his temporary service following amalgamation with Dena Bank. Court held he had no fundamental or vested right to regularization, having been appointed without regular process, but directed the Bank to consider his case sympathetically.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:051987
122
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3194-2024
Date of Decision: 18.04.2024
ASHWANI KUMAR
...Petitioner
Versus
BANK OF BARODA AND ANR
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:Mr. Satvir Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate with Mr. Tejinder Singh, Advocate for the respondents.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
HIMANSHU 2024.04.18 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CWP-3194-2024 -2-
he was appointed only on temporary basis, however, he claims that he had worked from 2013 to 2022. Thus, he should be permitted to continue in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Hargurpartap Singh V/s
State of Punjab 2007 (13) SCC 292.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
18.04.2024 JUDGE
himanshu
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
HIMANSHU 2024.04.18 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a temporary Sub-Staff employee not appointed against a sanctioned post through regular process has a right to continuation or regularization.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hargurpartap Singh V/s State of PunjabReferred¶3
2007 (13) SCC 292 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashwani Kumar
Bank of Baroda
Anr
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
