Disposed

Ramjit v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC15 Apr 2024CWP/322/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order in a writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation against his removal as a Municipal Councilor and directing the Principal Secretary to decide it. Pending applications are disposed of without detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file representation; Principal Secretary directed to decide within two months pending expiry.

Ramjit Vs State of Punjab and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

275

¶2

2024:PHHC:050294

¶3

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP No.322 of 2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.04.2024

Ramjit

..... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

¶9

..... Respondents

¶10

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

¶11

¶12

Present: Mr. K. S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Divyajyot Mann, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3. *******

¶14

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notification dated 21.12.2021 (Annexure P-4) whereby while exercising the powers under Section 16(1)(F) of Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, petitioner has been removed from the membership of Municipal Council as Municipal Councilor without taking into consideration the settled position of the law and further without holding any inquiry with regard to the allegations for which the order has been passed. Further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to maintain his position as Municipal Councilor, which is being tray to be snatched away by illegal means and allow him to participate in all meetings as well as to perform all duties of Municipal Councilor.

¶16

RITTU 2024.04.16 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

CWP No.322 of 2022 (O&M)

¶18

2024:PHHC:050294

¶19

-2-

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted before this

¶21

Court that the petitioner be granted liberty to file appropriate representation for the redressal of his grievances before respondent No.1 i.e. the Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Local Bodies, Chandigarh and he be directed to decide the same expeditiously.

¶22

Learned counsel for the State has submitted that if the petitioner files any such representation elaborating his grievance, the same would be decided expeditiously.

¶23

After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and perusing the record, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file his appropriate representation before respondent No.1 as prayed for within a period of 10 days from today. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner within the stipulated period, then respondent No.1 i.e. the Principal Secretary to Government of Punjab, Department of Local Bodies, Chandigarh is directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of its filing. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶24

(RAJESH BHARDWAJ) JUDGE

¶25

15.04.2024 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No

¶26

RITTU 2024.04.16 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ramjit v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramjit v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohan Lal Vs Commissioner Division Ambala and Others

Shishu Pal and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Arvind Kumar Saini and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Brij Pal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Trilok Chand Vs State of Haryana and Others

Jagdev Singh and Anr. Vs Superintending Canal Officer and Others