Writ petition against a university; counsel sought withdrawal as the cause had become infructuous with passage of time. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 3054 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.10.2024
Delhi Institute of Management and another
…..Petitioners
versus
Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE
Present : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate, for the respondent.
���������������������������������
Learned counsel for the petitioners at the very outset submits that the cause raised in the petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time and therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the petition.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as having rendered
infructuous.
(SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE
23.10.2024
| ravinder | Whether speaking/reasoned | √Yes/No |
|---|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No√ |
RAVINDER KUMAR 2024.10.24 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Delhi Institute of Management and another
Maharishi Dayanand University, Rohtak
Sheel Nagu
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
