Writ petition by a Faridabad college against the State of Haryana was withdrawn as counsel conceded it had become infructuous with efflux of time. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 16299 of 2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.10.2024
Faridabad College of Engineer and Management and another
…..Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others …..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL, JUDGE
Present : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Naveen S.Bhardwaj, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
Mr. Rajesh Gaur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
���������������������������������
Learned counsel for the petitioners at the very outset submits that the cause raised in the petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time and therefore, he prays for withdrawal of the petition.
In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as having rendered
infructuous.
(SHEEL NAGU)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE
23.10.2024
| ravinder | Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable Yes/No√ |
RAVINDER KUMAR 2024.10.24 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Faridabad College of Engineer and Management and another
State of Haryana and others
Sheel Nagu
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
