Petition challenged a 2013 order appointing respondent No.6 as Sweeper in place of the petitioner. State counsel stated respondent No.6 was adjusted on another post and petitioner continues as Gramin Safai Karamchari. Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
1058
CWP-20228-2013
Date of decision: 29.11.2024
Dharminder
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer made in the present petition is for setting aside the order
dated 14.02.2013, whereby the direction was issued to appoint respondent
No.6 as Sweeper, in place of the petitioner.
having been rendered infructuous.
4. Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 29.11.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.12.02 19:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the order appointing respondent No.6 as Sweeper in place of the petitioner survives.
Dharminder
State of Haryana
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
