Petition filed in May 2024 had Registry objections requiring re-filing within 40 days; listed after notice to counsel, but no one appeared for the petitioner. The court passed no further orders and disposed of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
139
INCOMP-7129-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.11.2024
Dr. Teena
....Petitioner
Versus
...Respondents
**CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *******
Present : None
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
28.11.2024 M.Kamra
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
MOHIT 2024.11.28 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Teena
Respondents (unnamed)
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
