Petitioner sought passport issuance via writ petition but application was pending due to lack of guardian decree. Court disposed of petition by accepting proposal for fresh application disclosing adoptive parents.
Petition disposed; petitioner to file fresh application disclosing adoptive parents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
102
2024:PHHC:061895 CWP-1723-2024 Date of Decision:06.05.2024
JASHANJOT KAUR
….Petitioner
vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Imram Farooqi, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Arvind Seth, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.06 04:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-1723-2024
-2- 2024:PHHC:061895
disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
06.05.2024 paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.06 04:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the respondent to issue a passport to the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jashanjot Kaur
Union of India
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
