Petitioner sought to withdraw its writ petition after arguments, with liberty to pursue statutory remedies. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition, disposing of pending applications.
Liberty granted to avail remedy under the Act; petition dismissed as withdrawn, pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16517-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.07.2024
M/S JVT T R ADING PRIVATE LIMITED
. . . . Petitio n er Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
. . . . Respondents
****
**CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL ******
Present Mr. Kashish Sahni, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, DAG , Haryana. **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE July 18, 2024 Mohit goyal 1. Whe t her speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whe t her reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.07.19 11:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
M/S JVT Trading Private Limited
State of Haryana
Another
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
