Writ petition withdrawn with liberty to challenge the notification itself; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6542-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.07.2024
VISHAV B A NDU VIJ
. . . . Petitio n er Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
. . . . Respondents **_****_ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL ******
Present Mr. R.K. Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Bhuvnesh Satija, DAG, Pu n jab.
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
July 18, 2024
Mohit goyal
1. Whe t her speaking/reasoned? Yes/No 2. Whe t her reportable? Yes/No
MOHIT GOYAL 2024.07.18 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vishav Bandu Vij
State of Punjab and Others
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
