Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared despite the case being called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:052643-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
212
CWP-15551-1997 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.04.2024
Ramji Lal and others
....Petitioners
Versus
Gram Panchayat Garhi Jattan and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LALIT BATRA
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Parth Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. P.P. Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Sureshwar Thakur, J. (Oral)
petitioners nor their validly engaged counsel is present before this Court.
prosecution.
(SURESHWAR THAKUR) JUDGE
19.04.2024 (LALIT BATRA) D.Gulati JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
DIWAKER GULATI 2024.04.20 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Ramji Lal and others
Gram Panchayat Garhi Jattan and others
Sureshwar Thakur
Lalit Batra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
