Disposed

Govinda and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Jan 2024CWP/1490/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought mandamus to accept manual applications for the PGT Computer Science recruitment under advertisement no.26 of 2023 and to consider their representation. The court, without deciding merits, directed respondent No.2 to decide the pending representation by a speaking order within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 03.01.2024 by speaking order within three months; ₹25,000 costs if not complied with.

Govinda and Others Vs State of Haryana and… — Education and Admissions | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

2024:PHHC:008336

CWP-1490-2024

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

111

¶6

CWP-1490-2024 Date of Decision: 23.01.2024

¶7

Govinda and others

¶8

…Petitioner(s)

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Haryana and another …Respondent(s)

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶12

Present:Ms. Sharmila Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners

¶13

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

¶14

¶15

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

¶16

This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to accept manual application of the petitioners and permit them to participate in the recruitment process pursuant to advertisement no.26 of 2023 dated 24.06.2023, Annexure P-1, for the post of PGT Computer Science. Further, a direction has been sought to the respondents to consider the representation dated 03.01.2024, Annexure P-4.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised

¶18

herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 03.01.2024, Annexure P-4, in a specified period.

¶19

PAYAL 2024.01.23 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:008336

CWP-1490-2024

-2-

Notice of motion.

¶24

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously.

¶25

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Secretary, Haryana Public Service Commission, to consider and decide the pending representation dated 03.01.2024, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶26

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹25,000 to the petitioners.

¶27

		(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
23.01.2024
Payal
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
	Whether reportable	Yes/No

¶28

PAYAL 2024.01.23 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Govinda and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Govinda and Others v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Singh Ahlawat Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ramesh Chand and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Renu Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others

Prashant Vs State of Haryana and Others

Subash Chander Vs State of Haryana and Others

Santosh Verma Vs St of Hry & Ors.