Disposed

Ramesh Singh Ahlawat v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Jan 2024CWP/1235/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought promotion to Principal/Deputy Director with benefits from a date a junior was promoted, and consideration of his pending representation. Without entering merits, the court disposed of the petition directing the Director General, Higher Education Department, Haryana, to decide the representation by speaking order within two months, failing which ₹25,000 costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ramesh Singh Ahlawat Vs State of Haryana and… — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

2024:PHHC:007868

CWP-1235-2024

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

112 CWP-1235-2024 Date of Decision: 20.01.2024

¶6

Ramesh Singh Ahlawat …Petitioner(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶10

Present:Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner (through Video Conferencing)

¶11

Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana

¶12

¶13

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

¶14

This petition has been filed, inter alia , seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Principal/Deputy Director in Group A (College Cadre) Level 14 of 7^th Pay Commission with all the admissible allowances and consequential benefits with effect from 06.10.2023 wherefrom a junior employee to the petitioner has been promoted. Further, a writ in the nature of mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to consider and decide representation dated 19.10.2023, Annexure P-3.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to PAYAL 2024.01.23 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:007868

CWP-1235-2024

-2-

decide the pending representation, dated 19.10.2023, Annexure P-3, in a specified period.

¶20

Notice of motion.

¶21

Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana , appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously.

¶22

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director General, Higher Education Department, to consider and decide the pending representation dated 19.10.2023, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶23

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹25,000 to the petitioner.

¶24

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 20.01.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶25

PAYAL 2024.01.23 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Ramesh Singh Ahlawat v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ramesh Singh Ahlawat v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrit Lal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ravinder Pal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Baljit Kumar, etc. Vs K.U.K. and Ors.

Ramesh Chand and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Renu Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others

Virender Vs State of Haryana and Ors.