Petition challenged a show cause notice as pre-determining termination of services. State counsel stated it was only a show cause notice and a speaking order would follow after considering the reply. Petition not pressed; petitioner permitted to file reply within two weeks, whereafter respondents to pass appropriate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No.2024:PHHC:006373
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
120
CWP- 1084-2024 (O&M) Decided on : 18.01.2024
RAMESH KUMAR
. . .PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
. . . RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
PRESENT: Mr. R. K. Malik, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kartikey Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
RIYA 2024.01.24 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP- 1084-2024 (O&M)
-22024:PHHC:006373
be terminated and an appropriate speaking order will be passed after appreciating the reply filed by the petitioner and in case, no reply is received from the petitioner then, the services of the petitioner be terminated within a period of thirty days.
disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
18.01.2024 Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes /No Whether Reportable: Yes /No
RIYA 2024.01.24 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the show cause notice dated 10.01.2024 predetermines termination of the petitioner's services and is liable to be set aside?
Ramesh Kumar
State of Haryana
Another
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
