Petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ petition citing inadvertent discrepancies in drafting, with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action with better particulars. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Liberty to file a fresh petition on same cause of action with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:006205
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
119
CWP-1074-2024 (O&M) Decided on : 18.01.2024
Smt. Kamla and another
. . .Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
PRESENT: Mr. Govind Mor, Advocate for Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that while drafting the present petition, inadvertently certain discrepancies have been occurred in the same, hence, the present petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action with better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
18.01.2024
Riya
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes /No Whether Reportable: Yes /No
RIYA 2024.01.18 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Smt. Kamla and another
State of Haryana and others
Harsimran Singh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
