Writ petition seeking issuance of a passport; Union of India stated the application was under active consideration and would be decided within six weeks, on which basis the court disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
104
����������������� CWP No.1052 of 2024 Date of Decision:30.01.2024
Jaswinder Singh
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and another
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashutosh Dhankar, Advocate for the Union of India
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
30.01.2024
paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.01.30 03:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's passport application, pending since 13.01.2023 with police inquiry completed and no criminal case pending, should be processed and a passport issued.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaswinder Singh
Union of India
another respondent (unnamed)
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
