Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
105
����������������� CWP No.1046 of 2024 Date of Decision:29.01.2024
Sushil Kumar
….Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Hemant Hans, Central Govt. Counsel for the Union of India
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
particulars.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE
29.01.2024
paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned: No Whether reportable:No
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.01.29 02:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sushil Kumar
Union of India
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
