Santosh and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.10033 of 2024 Date of Decision:17.05.2024
Santosh and another
….Petitioners
vs.
Union of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. M.S.Sidhu, Senior Panel Counsel for respondent No. 1 Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 2
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
“Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent-HPCL has accepted lease-deed executed by one owner and another owner had signed as witness. The signature by second owner as witness does not amount to compliance of conditions of brochure.
Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate submits that HPCL is accepting lease-deed which is executed by one
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.17 02:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No.10033 of 2024 -2-
out of two or more owners provided it is signed as witness by other co-owners.
Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate is hereby directed to file an affidavit of official concerned in support of his aforesaid averment.
Adjourned to 17.05.2024 .”
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
17.05.2024
paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.17 02:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Santosh and another
Union of India and others
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court