Petitioner sought retiral benefits from FCI. Respondents submitted they sanctioned gratuity, leave encashment, and other dues, rendering the petition infructuous. Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3961 of 2022 Date of Decision:16.05.2024
Jagdish Lal
….Petitioner
vs.
Food Corporation of India and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. B.S.Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. K.K.Gupta, Advocate for the respondents
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
“Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Advocate submits that Departmental proceedings have concluded and petitioner has been compulsory retired, thus he is entitled to retiral benefits.
Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate submits that petitioner has submitted representation seeking release of his retiral benefits. The matter is under active consideration and appropriate order is likely to be passed within two weeks.
Adjourned to 16.05.2024.
To be shown in Urgent.”
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.16 04:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP No.3961 of 2022 -2-
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
16.05.2024 paramjit
| Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes | |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable: | No |
PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.16 04:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jagdish Lal
Food Corporation of India
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
