Crisis-conscious petitioners seeking protection following marriage against family wishes. Single direction issued for State to ensure safety without comment on marriage validity.
Direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to provide necessary protection to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.115
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.9776 of 2024 Date of Decision:09.10.2024 Kri+ka Rani and another .....Pe++oners
Vs.
State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:Mr. S.S. Thind, Advocate for the pe��oners.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Having married against the wishes of their family members, pe��oners are now feeling threatened to their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents No.4 and 5 and have prayed for gran�ng them protec�on by way of this pe��on.
October 09, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.10.09 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Kri+ka Rani and another
State of Punjab and others
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
