Petitioners' counsel stated the writ petition would be withdrawn; the court accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn without any substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.9633 of 2024 Date of Decision:09.10.2024 Jaswinder Kaur and another .....Pe..oners Vs. State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:Mr. Harsimranpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kundra, Advocate for the pe��oners.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Statement is made by learned counsel for the pe��oners to withdraw the
present pe��on.
In view of the afore-said statement, the present pe��on is dismissed as
withdrawn.
October 09, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.10.09 19:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Jaswinder Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
