A married couple apprehending threat to life and liberty from private respondents sought police protection. The court, without commenting on the marriage's validity or the petitioners' ages, directed the SSP (Rural), Jalandhar to decide their representation and take lawful protective steps if a genuine threat was found.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRWP-9314-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-24.9.2024
Kirandeep Kaur and another … Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Satyam Sharda, Advocate for the petitioners.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
to the petitioners.
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.24 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRWP-9314-2024 (O&M)
( 2 )
24.9.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.24 17:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police protection should be directed for a couple alleging threat to life and liberty after marrying against their families' wishes.
Kirandeep Kaur
Parveen Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
