The High Court of Punjab and Haryana held a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition for quashing of FIR infructuous due to the death of the petitioner. The instant criminal proceeding was disposed off accordingly without further hearing.
Petition disposed off as infructuous due to death of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-32316-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-23.9.2024
Tarsem Singh … Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Ajit Singh Natt, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Paviterdeep Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned State counsel has informed that the petitioner has already expired.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition filed under provisions of Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR is rendered infructuous and is disposed off as such
| 23.9.2024 pankaj |
( Gu |
rvinder Singh Gill ) Judge |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.23 17:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition seeking quashing of FIR can be admitted when the petitioner has expired.
What is the proper disposal mechanism when the petitioner in a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition is deceased.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tarsem Singh
State of Punjab
Another
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
