Writ petition challenging deferral, for three years, of a life convict's premature release by the State Level Committee under the Haryana premature release policy. The Court found the committee had considered the gravity of the offence and declined interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
106
2024:PHHC:014653
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-916-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.02.2024
Raju Mandal ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Avtar Singh Bhatti, Advocate for the petitioner.
-.-
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral)
TRIPTI SAINI 2024.02.06 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2024:PHHC:014653
CRWP-916-2024 (O&M)
-2-
February 02, 2024 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No
TRIPTI SAINI 2024.02.06 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State Level Committee's decision deferring the petitioner's premature release for three years under the Haryana premature release policy warrants judicial interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju Mandal
State of Haryana
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
