Third regular bail petition under Section 439 CrPC in a POCSO and rape FIR; no one appeared for the petitioner on multiple dates and trial was pending defence evidence. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
209
2024:PHHC:014880
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-6141-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.02.2024
Harjit Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. C.L.Pawar, Addl. A.G Punjab.
Mr. Ramneek Vasudeva, Advocate for the complainant.
-.-
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral)
defence evidence.
TRIPTI SAINI 2024.02.06 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2024:PHHC:014880
CRM-M-6141-2023 (O&M)
-2-
February 02, 2024 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No
TRIPTI SAINI 2024.02.06 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Harjit Singh
State of Punjab
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
