Disposed

Taslima and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Sept 2024CRWP/8479/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking protection for a couple in a live-in relationship against threats from relatives was disposed of by directing the Superintendent of Police, District Nuh, to examine the petitioners' representation and take necessary steps if a genuine threat is found.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Superintendent of Police, District Nuh to look into the matter and take steps if genuine threat is found.

Taslima and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

CRWP-8479-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-03.09.2024

Taslima and another

… Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

¶7

... Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶9

Present:Mr. Waqar Ahmed Khurshid, Advocate for the petitioners (appeared through video conferencing).

¶10

Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 16.

¶11

¶12

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)

¶13

Petitioner No.1-Taslima aged about 22 years stated to be already married to Mufid son of Asru and petitioner No.2-Sohil Khan aged about 24 years, both of whom are in a ‘live-in’ relationship, have approached this Court seeking issuance of a direction to official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of private respondents No.4 to 16, who do not approve of their ‘live-in’ relationship.

¶14

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners but without commenting anything as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also as regards the sanctity of alleged relationship or age of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-

¶15

MOHAN SINGH 2024.09.03 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

¶16

CRWP-8479-2024 (O&M) ( 2 )

¶17

Superintendent of Police, District Nuh, to look into the matter and to dispose off the representation dated 29.08.2024 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

¶18

A copy of this order alongwith copy of the representation dated 29.08.2024 (Annexure P-4) be sent to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, District Nuh, so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.

¶19

It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged relationship or age of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.

¶20

03.09.2024 mohan		( GURVIN	DER SINGH GILL ) JUDGE
	Whether speaking /reasoned	Yes / No
	Whether Reportable	Yes / No

¶21

MOHAN SINGH 2024.09.03 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh

Taslima and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Taslima and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amritpal Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab

M/S Penguin Industries and Others Vs M/S Ramsons Cycles Pvt. Ltd.

Jyoti Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Goldy Vs State of Haryana

Gurdayal Singh and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Nidhi Vs State of Punjab