Wife sought enhancement of interim maintenance of Rs.3000 per month and litigation expenses granted by the Family Court, Faridkot under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Counsel withdrew the petition as the court was not inclined to interfere; dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 231 CR R (F)-865-2023 (O&M)
Dat e of Decision: 22.10.2024
Kiranpal K aur .… Petitioner
Versus Jagwinder Singh .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. A.S. Sekhon, Advocate f o r the petitioner.
Mr. Lovish Arora, Advocate f or the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
By way of filing the instant r evision petition, the petitionerwife seeks enhancement of interim maintenance @ Rs.3000/- per month granted to her vide impugned order da t ed 13.12.2022, passed by the learned F a mily Court, Faridkot, in a p roceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C.; b e sides a sum of Rs. 2000/- towar d s litigation expenses.
After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfer e in the matter, learned counsel fo r the petitioner submits that he may be pe r mitted to withdraw the instant r e vision petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application, if any, s h all also stand disposed of.
22.10.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.10.23 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kiranpal Kaur
Jagwinder Singh
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
