Appeal from 2016; appellant and counsel repeatedly absent on multiple dates including the day of hearing. Court found no interest in pursuing the appeal and dismissed it for non-prosecution, also disposing of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:020578 Page 1 of 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
216 CRM-A-1254-MA-2016 (O&M) Date of order: 12.02.2024
Anand Singh
…..Appellant(s)
Vs.
State of Haryana & Others
…..Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:None for the appellant.
Mr. Aditya Pal Singla, AAG Haryana.
Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate for Mr. Shubham Mangla, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.
Nidhi Gupta, J.
This appeal is of the year 2016. Perusal of order sheets
reveals that on 28.09.2018, there was no representation on behalf of either of the parties. Thereafter, on 05.07.2022 and 07.08.2023, the matter was
adjourned at request of learned counsel for the appellant.
behalf of the appellant. It seems that neither the appellant nor his counsel
is interested in pursuing the present appeal, and the same is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
12.02.2024 (Nidhi Gupta) Sunena Judge Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
SUNENA 2024.02.14 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Anand Singh
State of Haryana
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
