Petitioner sought regular bail in an FIR registered under IPC provisions. Counsel abandoned the petition; Court disposed of the matter as not pressed, reserving liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.40157 of 2024(O&M)
Date of Decision: 18.09.2024
Vikramdeep @ Vikramjit
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab … Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Bipin Ghai, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate and Mr. J.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, A.A.G., Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
| FIR | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. | |||
| 79 | 16.07.2020 | City Zira, District Ferozepur |
406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, 1860 |
up before this Court seeking regular bail.
present petition, at this stage.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
18.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.19 09:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vikramdeep @ Vikramjit
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
