Revision petition withdrawn by the petitioner at the outset; the High Court disposed of it as withdrawn along with pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
284
CRR-1950-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 12.11.2024
Vikram Kumar ......... Pe��oner
Versus State of Punjab and others ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present:Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Advocate for the pe��oner.
Mr. Akshay Kumar, A.A.G, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, counsel for the pe��oner wants to withdraw the present
pe��on.
Given above, present pe��on stands disposed of having been withdrawn. All
pending miscellaneous applica�ons, if any, stand disposed of.
12.11.2024 Jyo�-II
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
ANJU RANI 2024.11.14 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Vikram Kumar
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
