Leave to appeal against acquittal was dismissed for non-prosecution after the applicant failed to comply with an earlier order; pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
343 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-A No. 1308 of 2019 Date of Decision: 11.11.2024
Pankaj Sharma ...Applicant
Versus
Pooja Sharma and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Rohit, Advocate for Mr. Ramnish Puri, Advocate for the applicant.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Seeking se�ng aside of impugned judgment dated 26.03.2019 passed by Addi�onal and Sessions Judge, Amritsar, the applicant has come up before this Court by filing the present leave to appeal against acqui�al.
Order dated 21.10.2024 has not been complied with.
Given above, the present leave to appeal is dismissed for nonprosecu�on. All pending applica�ons, if any also stands disposed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
11.11.2024 Jyo� Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.
1
Jyoti Sharma 2024.11.12 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
Pankaj Sharma
Pooja Sharma
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
