Allowed

Gurbakshish Singh @ Nikka v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Mar 2024CRM-M/9667/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Punjab & Haryana High Court confirmed interim anticipatory bail for the petitioner in an NDPS case. The court held that since the petitioner joined the investigation as ordered earlier and was no longer needed for custodial inquiry, the previous interim bail stands confirmed subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Confirmed interim anticipatory bail granted on 28.02.2024; directed petitioner to join investigation as and when required.

Gurbakshish Singh @ Nikka Vs State of Punjab — Narcotics (NDPS) | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

N.C. No.2024:PHHC:039184

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

220

¶4

CRM-M-9667-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.03.2024

¶5

GURBAKSHISH SINGH @ NIKKA

....Petitioner(s)

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB

...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY

¶11

Present : Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶12

Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG Punjab.

¶13

¶14

SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral)

¶15

By way of present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR

¶16

(Annexure P-1) as under:

¶17

FIR No.	Dated	Sections	Police Station
18	05.02.2023	21 of the NDPS Act	Sadar Zira, District
		(29 of the NDPS Act added later on)	Ferozepur

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in compliance to

¶19

the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined

¶20

the investigation and as such interim bail granted to the petitioner may be confirmed.

¶21

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Avneet Singh has

¶22

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.03.19 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶23

N.C. No.2024:PHHC:039184 -2-

¶24

CRM-M-9667-2024 (O&M)

¶25

intimated that the petitioner has joined investigation and is no more required for

¶26

any custodial investigation in this case nor he is required for further investigation.

¶27

Heard.

¶28

During the course of hearing on 28.02.2024, the following order was

¶29

passed:-

¶30

“ 2. It is, inter alia, contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and is neither named in the FIR nor has any concern with the allegations levelled in the FIR but has been nominated on the disclosure statement made by the co-accused, namely Samuel, who was apprehended by the police along with non commercial quantity of contraband. He further contends that the petitioner was implicated in one more case registered under the NDPS Act that too under Section 29 of the NDPS Act, wherein no recovery was effected from the petitioner. He further contends that the petitioner is on bail in that case.

¶31

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that the petitioner is ready to join investigation

¶32

4. Notice of motion, returnable for 19.03.2024.

¶33

5. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Harpreet Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab, present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the Staterespondent and, on instructions from ASI Amarjeet Singh, PS Sadar Zira, District Ferozepur, submits that the petitioner has been nominated on the basis of disclosure statement made by the co-accused, namely Samuel. He prays for time to file the status report/reply in the matter.

¶34

6. Needful be done well before the date fixed with an advance copy to the counsel opposite.

¶35

7. In the meanwhile, the petitioner is hereby directed to join investigation within seven days from today and in the event of his arrest, he is ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”

¶36

Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation consequent to the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 28.02.2024 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as

¶37

and when required in future by way of written notice for such purpose to be served

¶38

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.03.19 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

¶39

N.C. No.2024:PHHC:039184

¶40

CRM-M-9667-2024 (O&M)

¶41

-3-

¶42

by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; he will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

¶43

7 . The petition stands allowed.

¶44

(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE

¶45

19.03.2024

¶46

S.Sharma(syr)

¶47

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/ No

¶48

SANDAL SHARMA 2024.03.19 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Gurbakshish Singh @ Nikka v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurbakshish Singh @ Nikka v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Yadwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Varish Khan Vs State of Punjab

Anish Khan Vs State of Haryana

Satya Devi Vs State of Punjab

Manjinder Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.