Petition for which the petitioner was in custody had become infructuous per the State counsel; with none appearing for the petitioner, the court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
N.C. No.2024:PHHC:039156
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
336
CRM-M-5300-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.03.2024
SATYA DEVI
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY
Present : None for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Harpreet Singh, Additional AG Punjab.
SANJIV BERRY. J. (Oral)
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Subhash Chander submits that the petitioner is already in custody in this case and as such the present petition has become infructuous.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the same, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 19.03.2024 S.Sharma(syr) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/ No
SANDAL SHARMA 2024.03.19 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Satya Devi
State of Punjab
Sanjiv Berry
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
