Disposed

Sudesh Rani v. Sanjay Kumar and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC8 Aug 2024CRM-A/85/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for leave to appeal against a 2011 acquittal. The High Court granted leave, admitted the main appeal for final hearing, and directed the accused to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 within two months as an undertaking to appear if the appeal succeeds.

What did the court decide?

Leave to appeal granted; main appeal admitted; accused to furnish personal bond of Rs. 10,000 within two months.

Sudesh Rani Vs Sanjay Kumar and Ors. — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

��

¶2

CRM-A-85-MA-2013

¶3

202 CRM-A-85-MA-2013 Sudesh Ranu vs. Sanjay Kumar and others Present: Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate for the applicant. None for respondents No.1 to 4.

¶4

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

¶5

¶6

CRM-A-85-MA-2013

¶7

Applicant’s counsel submits that the present application was filed against acquittal in the year 2011 and he has a very good case on merit.

¶8

None appeared on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 4. Leave to appeal granted.

¶9

The accused to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this court, in case the appeal is allowed.

¶10

In Mahidul Sheikh v. State of Haryana , CRM-33030-2021 in CRA-S-363-2020, decided

¶11

on 14-01-2022, Para 53, this Court observed,

¶12

[53]. The pragmatic approach is that while granting bail with sureties, the “Court” and the “Arresting Officer” should give a choice to the accused to either furnish surety bonds or to handover a fixed deposit, or direct electronic money transfer where such facility is available, or creating a lien over his bank account. The accused should also have a further option to switch between the modes. The option lies with the accused to choose between the sureties and deposits and not with the Court or the arresting officer.

¶13

Given above, within two months, the accused shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Ten Thousand only (INR 10,000/-) to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magis-

¶14

trate.

¶15

The attesting officer shall, on the reverse page of personal bonds, mention the permanent address of the accused along with the phone number(s), WhatsApp number (if any), e-mail (if any), and in case of any change, the Accused shall immediately and not later than 30 days from such modification, intimate about the change of residential address and change of phone numbers, WhatsApp number, e-mail accounts, to the Registry of this Court.

¶16

ANJU RANI 2024.08.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

¶17

CRM-A-85-MA-2013 ��

¶18

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance of the all stipulations, terms, and conditions of this bail order.

¶19

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

¶20

Registry to send copy of this order to the trial Court as well as to the respondents No.1 to 4. It is clarified that in case, after getting the copy of this order, respondents do not furnish bonds within two months, trial Court might proceed further in accordance with law.

¶21

Main appeal

¶22

Admit.

¶23

List for final hearing on its own turn as per its queue following the roster.

¶24

(ANOOP CHITKARA)

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

08.08.2024 anju rani

¶27

ANJU RANI 2024.08.12 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh

Sudesh Rani v. Sanjay Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudesh Rani v. Sanjay Kumar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaswant Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Satish Kumar Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Surjit Singh Vs Jasdeep Singh Walia

Balwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Balwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Another

Amandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab