Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the summoning order. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to move an application under Section 147 NI Act before the trial court, which was directed to decide it expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
115-A
CRM-M-4734-2024
Date of Decision: 08.08.2024
Balwinder Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another ....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate Ms. Bhumika Sachan, Advocate and Mr. Nitin Goswami, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab (Through VC).
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Seeking quashing of criminal complaint bearing NACT-309-2020 u/s 138 of NI Act 1881 and summoning order dated 01.03.2021 passed by the JMIC, Barnala, the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Section 482 CrPC.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
08.08.2024 anju rani
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/no Whether reportable? Yes/no
ANJU RANI 2024.08.09 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Balwinder Singh
State of Punjab
another
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
