Petition sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 120-B and 506 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. With no representation for the petitioner on multiple dates, the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
114-I
Criminal Misc. No. M-8322 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-17.12.2024
Shamim @ Sameen Khan
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another
…..Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:None for the petitioner.
Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, D AG, Haryana.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is f or quashing of FIR No.157 dated 26.10.2016 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 120-B and 506 IPC and Sect i on 6 of POCSO Act, registered at Women Police Station, Faridaba d , District Faridabad, on merits .
Order sheets show that f r om the last two dates i.e. 22.4.202 4 and 02.7.2024 there was no representation on behalf of petitione r . Even today nobody on beh a lf of petitioner is present to pursue th i s petition. It seems that the pe t itioner is no more interested to pursue the present petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecuti o n.
Decembe r 17, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.12.19 18.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Shamim @ Sameen Khan
State of Haryana
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
