Petition against GMADA disposed of by referring to a detailed order of even date passed in a connected matter (CRM-M-5489-2024, Jaswinder Singh Bachhal). No independent reasoning recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
279-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8049-2024 Date of Decision: October 15, 2024
MOHINDER SINGH @ MAHINDER SINGH AND ORS
…...Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(GMADA)
…...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Gautam Dutt, Advocate with Mr. Ribhav Singla, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Malkiat Singh, DAG, Punjab.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL)
For detailed order, see separate order of even date passed in CRM-M-5489-2024, titled as ‘ Jaswinder Singh Bachhal and Anr. Vs.
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority .
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE
15.10.2024 Sangeeta
Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SANGEETA 2024.10.18 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jaswinder Singh Bachhal and Anr. Vs. Greater Mohali Area Development AuthorityReferred
CRM-M-5489-2024
Mohinder Singh @ Mahinder Singh and Ors
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA)
Sandeep Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
