The petitioner filed an appeal under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an order. The Court dismissed the petition as it had become infructuous because the trial had already concluded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
268
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18099-2022 Date of Decision: October 15, 2024
NIRVAIR SINGH ….Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ….Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present: Mr. Kamal, Advocate for Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Malkiat Singh, DAG, Punjab.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(ORAL)
This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of order dated 21.04.2022 (Annexure P-3) passed in CRM No.362 dated 21.04.2022 in FIR No.54 dated 18.04.2022 under Sections 420, 323, 506, 148, 149 IPC and Section 25 and 27 of Arms Act registered at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur.
Learned State counsel submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the trial has been concluded.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of as having been
rendered infructuous.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE
15.10.2024 Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SANGEETA 2024.10.18 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nirvaair Singh
State of Punjab and Others
Sandip Moudgil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
