Petition sought setting aside of an appellate court order and stay of proceedings. Counsel stated the matter was settled between the parties; withdrawal permitted and the petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
253
Criminal Misc. No. M-7534 of 2024 Date of decision :-15.10.2024
Deepak Kumar
…..Petitioner
Versus
Seema
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. B.S. Beniwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for setting aside the order dated 05.1.202 4 (Annexure P-6) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F a tehabad in criminal appeal b e aring No.CRA-144-2023 as well as f o r stay of order dated 14.2.2023 a nd all the earlier subsequent proceedi n gs arising thereof.
At the very outset, learne d counsel for the petitioner submits t h at the matter has been settled b etween the parties and prays for withd r awal of the present petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.
October 1 5, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.10.16 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Deepak Kumar
Seema
Nidhi Gupta
Vijay Asija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
