Applicant sought permission to withdraw a Criminal Miscellaneous Application as the matter stood compromised between the parties. Permission was granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HI G H COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211 CR M -A-1709-MA-2018
Dat e of Decision: 15.10.2024
Luxmi De v i
.… Applicant
Versus
Sandeep a n d others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Ms. Kanchan Rani, Advocate for Mr. VK Gupta, Advocate for t he application.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
At the very outset, learned c o unsel for the applicant submits that she m a y be permitted to withdraw the p resent Criminal Miscellaneous Applicatio n as, the matter stands compromised between the parties.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
15.10.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.10.16 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Luxmi Devi
Sandeep
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
