Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. Court held that since the petitioner joined investigation, the earlier bail order is made absolute but appearance as required is directed.
Order dated 05.03.2024 passed for anticipatory bail made absolute; petitioner to appear as required under Section 438(2) CrPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
205
2024:PHHC:056326 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-6543-2024 Date of Decision: April 25, 2024
MANAK
........Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: Mr. Kuldeep Singh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Through this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.45 dated 23.08.2022 registered under Sections 457, 380, 427 and 201 of IPC at P.S.Morinda, District Ropar.
4. Disposed of accordingly.
| 25.04.2024 Tejwinder |
( |
HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE |
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.04.26 09:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail order should be kept in force given the accused joined investigation,
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Manak
State of Punjab
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
