The petitioners sought protection of life and liberty under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after marrying against the wishes of private respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
235-2 CRM-M-5267-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.08.2024
Baljit Kaur and another
.… Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Navraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Rishu Madan, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for issuance of directions to respondents No. 2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners and not to harass them as they have got married against the wishes of private respondents No. 4 to 9.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
02.08.2024
Divyanshi
(NIDHI GUPTA) JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:
Yes/No Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.08.07 14:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Baljit Kaur
another
State of Punjab
others
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
