Dismissed

Konnal Bhatti v. Poonam Konnal Bhati

Punjab & Haryana HC1 Aug 2024CRR/255/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband sought revision against dismissal of appeals over a domestic violence maintenance order. Following a co-ordinate Bench ruling that DV Act proceedings are civil and not assailable via Section 482 or 397 Cr.P.C., the petition was withdrawn with liberty to pursue an appropriate remedy within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue appropriate remedy within four weeks.

Konnal Bhatti Vs Poonam Konnal Bhati — Domestic Violence | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRR-255-2024 (O&M) -1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

232

¶4

CRR-255-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.08.2024

Konnal Bhatti

.… Petitioner

Versus

Poonam Kunal Bhatti

.... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶11

Present: - Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

¶13

NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

¶14

Prayer in the present petition is to common judgment dated 07.11.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala whereby two criminal appeals i.e. 182/2022 and 183/2022 filed by the petitioner-husband and respondent-wife against the order dated 13.06.2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Patiala in CIS No. COMA-587-2021 under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, have been dismissed.

¶15

At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy within a period of four weeks from today, in accordance with law, in view of judgment dated 24.04.2023 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M19553-2023 titled as ‘ Jaspal Kaur alias Pinki and others vs. State of Punjab and another ’, wherein it has been held that ‘ the proceedings

¶16

DIVYANSHI 2024.08.02 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

CRR-255-2024 (O&M) -2-

¶18

under Section 12 of the DV Act are civil in nature, therefore, a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. or revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C., assailing the order passed in complaint filed under the provisions of DV Act are not maintainable’.

¶19

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

¶20

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶21

01.08.2024 (NIDHI GUPTA) Divyanshi JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶22

DIVYANSHI 2024.08.02 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Konnal Bhatti v. Poonam Konnal Bhati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Konnal Bhatti v. Poonam Konnal Bhati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sompal Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Arun Vs State of Haryana and Another

Gurjant Singh Vs Paramjit Kaur

Harsh Sharma Vs State of Punjab and Another

Poonam Konaal Bhatti Vs Konaal Bhatti and Another

Arvinder Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Anr.