Disposed

Aruna v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC23 Sept 2024CRM-M/47345/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought directions for free and fair investigation of her complaint under Section 528 BNSS. Court permitted her to file a fresh representation before the Commissioner of Police within 15 days, to be decided within two months by a speaking order communicated by e-mail.

What did the court decide?

Permission to file fresh representation within 15 days; Commissioner of Police to decide within two months by reasoned order communicated via e-mail.

Aruna Vs State of Punjab and Others — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CRM-M No. 47345 of 2024

¶2

121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M No. 47345 of 2024

¶4

Date of Decision: 23.09.2024

¶5

Aruna ...Pe��oner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Punjab and others …Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

¶9

Present: Ms. Ravisha Mahajan, Advocate for the pe��oner.

¶10

Ms. Swa� Batra, D.A.G., Punjab.

¶11

****

¶12

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

¶13

Seeking issuance of appropriate direc�ons to respondents No.2 to 5 to conduct free and fair inves�ga�on on the complaint filed by the pe��oner, the pe��oner has come up before this Court under Sec�on 528 BNSS.

¶14

Counsel for the pe��oner submits that the pe��oner would be contended and sa�sfied if she is permi�ed to file a fresh representa�on before the Commissioner of Police within 15 days and the concerned officer is directed to decide the same in a �me bound manner.

¶15

No�ce served upon the official respondent through State counsel. The nature of order which this Court proposes to pass, there is no necessity of calling any response from the State.

¶16

State counsel submits that they would take decision on the fresh representa�on, if any filed within a period of three months.

¶17

In view of prayer made by counsel for the pe��oner, she is permi�ed to file fresh representa�on before respondent No.3 within 15 days men�oning her e-mail ID as well as of her counsel and respondent No.3 i.e. Commissioner of Police is directed to decide the same, if filed either himself/herself or by delega�ng the same to any

¶18

¶19

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

¶20

CRM-M No. 47345 of 2024

¶21

officer not below the rank of IPS, within a period of two months by passing a speaking and reasoned order and such order be also communicated to the pe��oner as well as her counsel on the e-mail ID provided on the representa�on.

¶22

There would be no need for a cer�fied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Pe��oner and State can download this order and other relevant par�culars from the official web page of this court and a�est it to be a true copy.

¶23

Pe��on is disposed of with the observa�ons men�oned above. All pending applica�ons, if any, stand disposed.

¶24

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 23.09.2024 Jyo� Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No.

¶25

¶26

Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.24 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh

Aruna v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aruna v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Arora and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Gurpreet Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab Anr.

Avtar Singh Vs State of Punjab

Ranjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Manpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Rajdeep Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others